Looking past the foot-stomping tantrums of the petulant little bullies currently catching the spotlight, the lies and tortured statistics belonging to the corporate media’s army of demagogic cons masquerading as journalists, as well as the daily dose of attempted emotional manipulation coming from the greater body of the nation’s Democrats, and it is found that there is in reality but two primary motivations behind the collective Left’s push for so-called gun-control- a term which, for them, is synonymous with eventual total gun confiscation.

The first of the two primary reasons that liberals, progressives, socialists, communists and fascists (all Utopians in their various forms) want to disarm the USA is that they are painfully aware of their own violent and hate-filled natures, and know that due to these ugly urges they themselves cannot be trusted with responsible firearms ownership. They then project their own hate-filled violent nature onto America’s conservatives, erroneously believing that since we disagree with them politically, we must also feel inclined to do the same to them that they wish to do to us- commit murder. But as conservatives, we don’t think that way. It is our reverence for the law and the belief in everyone’s right to liberty (even those with whom we disagree) that guides our actions. Thus, for a true conservative, the thought of taking violent action against someone with whom we disagree is inconceivable- especially with a firearm. Win or lose, we settle our differences at the ballot box. In this first instance, which boils down to the psychological phenomenon of projection, the Utopians are completely wrong.

The second of the two primary reasons that Utopians wish to disarm America is due to the inherent characteristics of the economic policies attached to all Utopian ideologies. In the cases of modern-liberalism, progressivism (the mirror-image of fascism), socialism and communism, implementation of these ideologies begins with theft of private property and the product of labor, and concludes with slavery, and far too often, is accompanied by periods of mass-murder in between. Ergo, even if the Utopians were to gain complete control of the USA’s military, implementing such horrors (which in their self-delusions they imagine to be paradise) would be a near-impossibility with almost half of the USA’s population armed. Thus, the second primary motivating reason for the Utopians’ advocating gun control is as sinister as the first – it is to render the nation’s citizenry defenseless and then steal the product of our labor, make slaves of us, and kill those of us they may feel are problematic to their cause. In the case of this second primary reason, the Utopians are correct, as it can be assured that conservatives will use firearms in a responsible manner- to defend the USA, the Constitution, the cause of liberty and to defend innocent lives against the violent hate-filled henchmen of the world’s wealthy would-be tyrants.

Carpe Noctem,




Excepting the members of her cult of boot-licking sycophantic followers, is there anyone left in America who does not think that every time Hillary Clinton says something there is a good chance that what issues forth from her yap is going to be a big pile of Bolshevik? Of course, there has been almost zero public accountability for Ms. Clinton’s many Bolshevik stories, this due to the American corporate media being primarily comprised of either Clinton’s friends, allies sharing the same political objectives, or the aforementioned members of her cult of boot-licking sycophantic followers. But facts are facts. A quick review: Clinton’s claims of Russian hacking and the 2016 Election? Well, recent revelations suggest Ms. Clinton as being full of Bolshevik. (Were Seth Rich alive I’m sure he’d agree!) Ms. Clinton’s down-play of the Russian Uranium One deal (involving her so-called charity)? Apparently, and in light of recent revelations, her statements that this issue has already been, “debunked,” may also prove to be pure Bolshevik. Taking a step back to before the 2016 Election, what about Hillary Clinton’s explanations regarding her alleged violations of the law in the infamous email scandal? According to tomes of data conflicting with her story (thank you, Judicial Watch), it looks like another big pile of HRC’s Bolshevik! Even her claims as to why she believes she lost the 2016 Presidential Election, detailed in her recent book, seem to suggest that, and once again, Ms. Clinton is totally full of Bolshevik!

The verdict? Hillary Rodham-Clinton is a total Bolshevik-artist!

Carpe Noctem




Utopianism: the ideological fantasy of creating the perfect society through progressivism, modern liberalism, communism, socialism, fascism, or anarchism.

The great irony of Utopian ideology is that due to the selfishness, avarice, intolerance and violent lawless nature of those who naturally gravitate towards any of the Utopian ideologies, the Utopians are inherently incapable of maintaining, or existing within, such systems, and it is only those liberty-minded men and women who oppose Utopianism that could actually make it work. And as history demonstrates, often when the Utopians come to a position of absolute power, the first thing they do is intimidate, incarcerate, torture and murder all influential non-Utopians, leaving only violent, hate-filled, selfish Utopians left to administer the system, and thereby ensuring the failure of the system (Soviet Union, China, North Korea, etc.). The irony concludes with a paradox in that the only way to make any form of Utopian ideology work is to first exile to some remote corner of the Earth all of those men and women of a Utopian mind-set, leaving only those men and women with sufficiently good character to oppose any sort of Utopian system left to administer and participate in said system, which, of course, their collective good character would forbid them from participating.


Through the millennia, and in all four quarters of the globe, men and women have faced the challenge of living under one form of tyranny or another. This state of the human condition originates in the matter of the human conscience, or lack thereof. Those men and women with a conscience seek fair and equitable relations with others, while those without a conscience see those who strive towards such things as being weak and ripe for exploitation. Thus, the human condition is such that those without conscience will always strive to subjugate those whose conscience bars them from subjugating others. That this condition places those with a conscience at a great disadvantage is incontrovertible. Ergo, from the time of ancient Sumer, men and women of conscience have been striving towards building law-based government of society for the purpose of balancing the inequity between men and women of conscience, and those without conscience, the latter whom we refer to now in this modern age as sociopaths. History teaches that none have been one-hundred-percent successful in building the perfect society. I believe that, and due to the nature of mankind, Utopia is an impossibility. But what was started in the American colonies in 1776, and what it has evolved into since that time, is, as far as my research has yielded, the best that humanity is capable of in making a civilized society.

Free your mind from the sociopaths’ deception by allowing yourself to meditate for just a moment on this notion: Based upon what we have been taught about history, give consideration to the varying states of the world over the past 5,000 years. Consider that the age of the USA (241 years) spans less than five-percent of that 5,000 year block of time, and yet, within this small fraction of humanity’s civilized experience, this nation has legally established the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness by all men and women regardless of color or religion – legally established rights that the nation’s courts uphold for everyone year after year. Consider that what has happened within America’s borders in this relatively short period of time has not only made an impression upon the whole world, but changed a large potion of the world for the better, as well as not only having exposed the forces of tyranny, but having put those tyrannical forces on the defensive. If the preceding words do not lead one to understand the importance of the USA’s constitutional form of government, in its unadulterated and undiluted form, as it relates to the positive evolution of the whole world, then I believe one is utterly unreachable. Moreover, if in regards to the nation’s courts recognizing equality among all men and women, one cites the rocky road from America’s first days to the achievements of this present day as proof of a flaw in America or the Constitution, then one is either an idiot or a liar, because society’s developing in this manner is the way of humanity.

Under a law-based system wherein the inalienable rights of the individual are both recognized and protected by government, the sociopath is given no advantage. However, under any other form of government, be it monarchy, dictatorship, communism, socialism, fascism, tribalism, etc., the sociopath is given a definite advantage. The sociopath thrives in an environment of tyranny, and thus the sociopath is always working towards, or supporting, the establishment of tyranny. And while the condition of tyranny is formally defined as oppressive rule by government, fundamentally, I regard it as being just another form of slavery, but in this case, the ‘slave owner’ is comprised of the administrators of the state. Slavery is amongst the most vile things that men and women devoid of conscience have forced upon the world, and it manifests in various forms. The oldest form of slavery is chattel slavery, and next to it, monarchy’s division by class renders the peasant a slave to the aristocracy. The vassalage of the old world, and debt-slavery created by usury, were later forms. In modernity, communism, socialism and fascism not only make slaves of the masses to the administrators of each of these systems, but strive towards even the regulation of the individual’s thoughts. In the case of any man or woman who has their right to follow a path of their own choosing to their desired life’s destination, countermanded by the tyranny of fascism, socialism, communism, etc., by this they are made just as much a slave as was any man or woman who lived in human bondage in ancient Egypt, in ancient Greece or Rome, in Arabia, under the British monarchy, or as a chattel slave or indentured servant in early America.

In every successful used car salesman there must exist some measure of sociopathy. It’s a job requirement. That is why so many men who are disliked for other reasons connected to anti-social or dishonest behavior are associated with used car salesmen. No one can sell as well as a sociopath because the sociopath’s advantage is both the ability to deceive and a lack of conscience. By adulthood, the sociopath has developed the skill of telling people what they want hear in order to achieve his or her own personal goals. Thus, the sociopaths have instilled in the minds of many women and men that systems of government such as communism, socialism and fascism are ‘kinder, gentler forms of slavery’ – forms of slavery that can be trusted. This pitch zeroes in on a frailty in the human character which gives some men and women the inclination towards, and preference for, being ruled over in exchange for being taken care of (the tranquility of servitude) versus bravely living lives of liberty and self-determination. However, there must also be some measure of sociopathy within all who acquiesce to, and support, communistic, socialistic and fascistic movements, due to the selfishness required to willingly support the state’s confiscation and redistribution of one’s neighbors property and assets (theft) as well as the selfishness required to willingly cast one’s neighbor into a state of subservience to the state (slavery). Indeed it takes a special variety of either deviate or dummy (or both) to willingly make slaves of their own family and friends, as well as their neighbors and countrymen. This last statement takes on a greater significance in regards to this present day, as there exists tomes of historical records to demonstrate beyond any doubt the heinous brutality and mass murder the sociopathic administrators of communism, socialism and fascism will engage in once in power. I find it inconceivable that anyone mentally capable of tying a pair of shoes cannot see the danger in handing over such power to those men and women with a desire to rule over others, as well as the inability to grasp the fact that under any of the Utopian systems, ultimately, the parasites will outnumber the producers, and at that time, the money will stop flowing, the food and medicine will run short, the boilers will go cold and the lights will go out.

Outrageous is the hypocrisy of the Democrats, the liberals and the progressives (as well as those actual communists, socialists, fascists, etc., operating within America) to constantly, and from one side of their mouths, denounce the obvious evils of chattel slavery in early America (something the Democratic party supported at that time) but then from the other side of their mouths, to tout the so-called benefits of the ‘kinder gentler forms of slavery’ found in communism, fascism and socialism. And beyond their hypocrisy, they lie outright. The last 100 years have proven that ‘kinder and gentler they are not, and that communism, socialism and fascism are in fact among the most brutal forms of slavery. While a large portion of those who just this past year were ‘with her’ or ‘feeling the Bern’ will prove to be unreachable (sociopaths cannot be reasoned with based upon ‘right or wrong’, but do understand the concept of consequences) it is now up to America’s conservatives to remind as many of them as is possible that slavery in any form is wrong.

Carpe Noctem,




Mass illegal immigration has been encouraged by the Federal Reserve to suppress inflation figures by lowering the cost of labor. I know this to be a fact because during the time of the G. W. Bush Administration, I watched on C-Span as now former Federal Reserve Chairman, Alan Greenspan referred to this during one of his mandated speeches to Congress. From my best memory, I believe what he said was, “In order to keep inflation figures in check it is essential that the free flow of labor continue to cross over the border unabated.” Thus, mass illegal immigration has been used by the Fed (at least since the Clinton years and maybe even earlier) to offset the Fed’s own malfeasance and economic mismanagement by lowering wages in a climate of rising costs of living. Illegal immigration was used in this way because, due to the inevitable destruction it would bring to the working and middle-classes, the American people would have never agreed to admit the same numbers of people intended for the labor market through the process of legal immigration. (Is this intentional undermining of the American work force not the definition of betrayal and brutality?)

This condition would certainly offer at least one explanation for the bizarre refusal to uphold the nation’s immigration laws exhibited by America’s four past Presidents, as well as Congressional Democrats and Republicans.

Besides the Federal Reserve, two other sectors have enjoyed the benefits of this economic influence, the first being large corporations operating in the USA, this due to the lowered cost of labor across the board, and the second sector being white liberal elitists employing nannies and gardeners, etc. on the cheap. In other words, due to mass illegal immigration and DACA, these two entities enjoy benefits similar to the owning of slaves. In the meantime, this interruption in (or manipulation of) the natural economic cycle has priced millions of American citizens out of their own labor market and into states of poverty and prolonged unemployment resulting in greater dependency upon government-funded social services. So aside from its being a form of corporate welfare and a source of slave-labor for white liberal elitists, DACA is a continuation of the injury that has been inflicted upon the American working and middle-classes since 1989 when George H. W. Bush and Al Gore Jr. worked together, rallied the votes, and granted Communist China a favored-nation trade status.

I’ll reiterate: DACA is corporate welfare. The American public bears the burden of cost, while large, America-hating corporations benefit from the lowered cost of labor. I say, “Free these unwitting slaves from their corporate bondage and servitude to vile elitists and Hollywood-types (I may have just repeated myself) and send them back to their homelands to live as free men and women.”

DACA is caca!

Carpe Noctem,




The following text regarding Stephen T. Colbert represents my opinion as an astrologer.

While it takes little more than a cursory observation of hack-comedian and CBS Late Show host, Steven T. Colbert’s poor taste and hatred of America (passed off as comedy) to recognize him for what he is, that being a demagogic propagandist, I regard it as being my duty as an astrologer to assess what the stars say about this leg-humping geek’s influence upon the USA.

Firstly, in my opinion, and as it relates to his relationship with the USA and the American people, Colbert’s nativity reveals a mule-headed and contradictory type of man with overt hostilities towards the nation’s traditional values and the people who hold such values. Add to this the suggestion of his harboring anti-social leanings on matters of authority in general, as well as the exercising of his own authority and his power to influence others. Secondly, and of even greater relevance, Colbert is a man with his Sun (in the twenty-fourth degree of Taurus) resting upon the fixed star named Capulus, a point in the heavens which the ancients determined that when an individual is thrust into the arena of politics or the public’s eye, gave said individual great influence, but proved, in time, that if that influence was not used for the sake of good, or if it was used in a brutish or egomaniacal manner, it would eventually lead the individual to a dramatic public fall (in ancient times it often meant decapitation). Coincidentally, this degree is one which opposes (within one degree of ‘orb’) a highly sensitive degree in the horoscope of the USA, one which my work has consistently proven to coincide with acts of betrayal, conspiracy, treason, sedition, espionage and sabotage.

Now mind you, I am not saying that Colbert has engaged in some sort of a conspiracy – a sneaky back room deal, for instance, to incite opposition to the party in power in the USA. I repeat, I am not saying that. But I am saying that key points in Colbert’s nativity suggest the potential for his conspiring with someone during the latter part of the year 2016 – a conspiracy to take action against the established foundations of order within United States of America – an astrological influence that would fall under what I refer to as a “Twelfth House influence.” Who might be this individual, hypothetically, that is? Well, let me first state that I am only an astrologer and not a god (nor even a good psychic). However, and oddly enough, the planetary correspondents for the theoretical co-conspirator describe an individual that might look a lot like Hillary Rodham-Clinton. I am using Clinton as an example because she is a high-profile individual who’s personal horoscopic points not only run afoul with the aforementioned sensitive point in America’s own horoscope, but correlate to the physical attributes of of the zodiacal degrees held by Colbert’s offending planets. In other words, just prior to the time that Colbert began to engage in his nightly assault against America’s duly elected President (and all who voted for him), two of his planets moved into zodiacal degrees that not only offend the USA, but cast significant aspects to key points in the horoscope of Hillary Rodham-Clinton. Kind of a funny thing, huh? (Could it be in fact that the mouth of that sad little weenie, Stephen T. Colbert, is actually HRC’s “c*** holster?”) Having analyzed hundreds of horoscopes of political and other notable figures in relation to the horoscope of the USA (we astrologers call this ‘synastry’) there is one thing that I will say about Colbert with great confidence and that is based upon the zodiacal degree held by the Sun at the time of his birth, his aforementioned ugly characteristics will rise to prominence in his relationship with the USA and the American people, and if it is only through nothing more than his potty-mouthed bashing of America and the will of We the People, his primary motivation (if even only subconscious) will be to bring injury upon the foundations and great traditions of the nation.

Colbert’s overt anti-Americanism rose to prominence coincidental to the 2016 US Presidential Election, a time when America’s ideological civil war went from a slow simmer to boiling over – the nation being divided between those who wish to discard liberty for the so-called “tranquility of servitude” afforded through the slavery that is globalist-socialism, versus those who wish to maintain America’s sovereignty, the rule of law, a state of maximum individual liberty, as well as the opportunity to live in a state of peace and prosperity. Colbert’s high-profile role in this civil war on the side that advocates human bondage is also coincidental to his horoscopic Sun, in what we call Secondary Progression (a key measurement) in conjunction (id est, the same zodiacal degree) to the USA’s horoscopic Sun. My work has revealed that such an influence will often yield to an individual in the nation’s public eye an almost hypnotic effect upon the weaker-willed portion of the population. (George W. Bush, coincidentally, enjoyed a variation of this same horoscopic influence). This influence is, however, ephemeral, and will soon come to an end (by the close of 2018), and at that point in time, it is my opinion that this shameful America-hater, Stephen T. Colbert, will suffer a slow, but irreversible, fall from popularity, and will subsequently slide into a state of embittered obscurity.

Good riddance. 

Carpe Noctem




While I’m quite fond of the nationalist perspective, based upon my observations, the majority of Americans have come to believe, and erroneously so, that the only eventual outcome of the nationalist perspective is something akin to Germany’s Third Reich. That is, of course, nonsense. But, and as ridiculously contradictory as it sounds, we do live in an age wherein many Americans have been brainwashed into believing that patriotism is somehow anti-American. However, because the majority of Americans now believe this does not make it right, nor does being part of the majority on this matter serve as a reasonable defense for holding this self-injurious belief as truth. But this majority-perspective can be explained as it is just this sort of an absurdity that is the logical cost to a society for its toleration of a decades-long propaganda campaign spearheaded by corporate media and academia, and focused upon instilling in the populace unjustified feelings of guilt, an imaginary sense of division among one’s countrymen, and an irrational sense of fear instilled by incessant baseless alarms of potential attacks from hypothetical enemies both from within and outside the country.

This same misguided majority, having succumbed to the endless attacks upon their psyches, has somehow come to believe that being an American – and promoting the ideals that made America great – somehow requires the relinquishing of not only sacred individual rights and great American traditions, but altruism to the point of self-obliteration, and worst of all, the staggering cost, both in dollars and blood, of playing police officer and moral referee to the world.

But despite the untiring efforts of corporate media and academia, not all of us have bought into the bullshit.

Those of use who have chosen to continue to think for ourselves despite the media’s constant drumbeat of guilt, envy and fear are, by my observations, in the minority. And we continue to recognize that the ideas that were born in 1776 on the land that is now called America, are the same ideas that have elevated the whole world to the awareness of the concept of the right of the individual to, “Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” and the primary purpose of government being to protect that right. Those of us in the political minority who believe that America’s ability to continue to influence the world as a positive role model hinges on America’s maintaining its sovereignty, identity and integrity, as well as its economic and military strength, are nationalists.

Personally, I define nationalism as: America first.

For me, ‘America first’ means We the People placing the good interests of our nation and our people above the interests of any other nation or people in the world – taking care of our own first, and then from our abundance – and without causing injury to ourselves – giving charity to foreign people as they both need and deserve, and leading them to lives of liberty, peace and prosperity through our setting an example – and not by playing world policeman or moral referee.

America first. I can say this phrase without any sense of guilt. I can say ‘America first’ without feeling as though it divides me from my countrymen, no matter their race, religion or economic class. I can say ‘America first’ without the fear of it leading me to being any more vulnerable to attack by enemies from within or outside my country.

Can you?

Carpe Noctem,



Allow yourself to imagine that you are a spectator in an enormous, roaring coliseum and awaiting the ‘big game’ – a grudge match between two legendary teams that have been rivals from the very beginning.  This is team ‘Red’ versus team ‘Blue’, and the air is filled with excitement!  Gathered about on the right side of the coliseum are big groups of fans of team Red, donning their blazing-red garb.  On the left side of the coliseum are throngs of fans of team Blue, festooned in their own brilliant blue costuming.  As is the case at any big event, the newsmen and newswomen are there, and with microphones in hand, they recite back-stories, offer opinions on the mind-sets and motives of the players, and speculate on the outcome of the game.  The cameras catch every detail!  Down below on the playing field, and to the right, bright, fresh-faced cheerleaders in red uniforms perform, cheer and wave their pompoms, while to the left, their energetic counterparts dressed in blue do the same.

But wait! Something is amiss!

“Rah, rah, rah! Red butts don’t smell!  Rah, rah, rah, Blue will burn in Hell!” shout the Red team’s cheerleaders, to which team Blue’s respond with, “Sis, boom, bah!  Blue crap doesn’t stink!  Sis, boom, bah! Red’s little brain can’t think!”

A closer examination reveals that the roaring crowd within the coliseum is not comprised of primarily happy, excited spectators of the game, but instead, they are angry, self-righteous fanatics, each side hurling irrational accusations towards the opposite side of the arena, then following up with unqualified boasts of their respective teams’ virtue, before finishing with fist-pumps and turning to give each other high-fives.  But what the fans cannot see, as they are either so caught up in the event itself, or due to their ego and emotions being so inextricably tied to the team which they find superior to the other – is that the coaches and the players from both teams are laughing their assess off at them!

That’s right! The joke is on the fans!

As the spectators are occupied with one side trying to prove to the other that their team is superior, the players from both teams are engaged in collusion and fixing the game, vandalizing the coliseum, picking the pockets of the attendees, and raping the cheerleaders.  And as the players from team Red and team Blue do their dirty deeds right in front of the spectators’ faces, as well as in front of the reporters from the news, the players’ friends are busy breaking into the cars in the coliseum parking lot, stealing the change from the ashtrays, the radios, and when possible, stripping the cars bare.

By the end of the day, and as the spectators exit the coliseum, the only thing that has been accomplished by the players is the destruction of the coliseum and a long list of criminal acts, all of which is underscored by a complete breach of trust.  But make no mistake!  By the time the footage from the game hits the morning news, the agencies supporting team Blue will have edited from their report the Blue team’s involvement in anything questionable, just as those in the media who are biased towards team Red will have edited their own footage, leaving team Red to appear to be above reproach.

So what is this sport that reduces men and women to such sophomoric behavior?  And which so successfully beguiles them all to engage in self-injurious incoherence and disgraceful willful incomprehension?

The game is American politics!

Intellectually, for those Americans who embrace the American Founders’ doctrine of continually striving towards a state of maximum individual liberty, peace and prosperity, it is difficult to understand how the fanatical supporters of either team Red – the Republican Party – or team Blue – the Democratic Party – distinguish themselves from each other, as both parties are equally, and irreversibly, corrupt.  But this is due to the fact that, and generally speaking, those Americans who pursue the doctrine of liberty, peace and prosperity, do so not from a sense of one’s feelings, or by the motivations of the ego, but as the product of the intellect!  Thus, if one is to understand the mentality of these same misguided, and often sophomoric, souls, and how they can legitimize their resting the safety of their own futures with either team Red or team Blue, as well as understand what, in their minds, individualizes the characteristics of the Democratic and Republican parties, one must first examine the matter by analysis of the emotional triggers and egotistical motivations used by the parties to manipulate their constituencies.

In this brief, three-part review, I will attempt to summarize the team Red and team Blue mind-sets, as well as informally rate them both according to the doctrine of ‘liberty, peace and prosperity’.  Let us remember that, while the majority of the two parties’ positions mentioned will seem completely irrational, they are, nonetheless, what has been clung to by the majority of the American public, that is, those who are driven to decisions by their feelings and/or their egos, as opposed to their intellects.

Firstly, both the Republicans and Democrats have their own uniquely strange, and nonintellectual, perspectives on the matter of individual liberty. For those of the Democratic persuasion, liberty is first and foremost defined in terms of sexuality, and in this, the liberty to engage in the sexual activity of one’s choosing, with a striving for special legal and societal dispensations to be granted to those activities that deviate from the norm.  The Democratic mind-set also regards ‘maximum personal liberty’ as being realized when there are no legal or societal restrictions placed upon one’s consumption of intoxicating substances, nor any sort of legal or societal compulsion to respect the property rights of anyone who holds property in a sum greater than the proletariat average.  The Democratic mindset fails most dramatically on the matter of individual liberty when it comes to the right to self-defense, and the right to free enterprise, believing government must somehow always be a ‘partner’ in one’s business.  This stunning failure is exacerbated by the Democrats’ enthusiasm towards the violation of property rights, and the right to free enterprise, through progressive taxation, though, and ironically so, the statistics suggest that Democrats are much more likely to cheat on their taxes than are Republicans.  Finally, the Democrats’ failure on the matter of liberty is recognized in their party’s overt attacks upon any form of speech or personal expression that is contrary to Democratic rhetoric – they were, after all, the coiners of the phrase ‘politically correct’!  While those of the Republican persuasion give high regard to maximum individual liberty on matters of the right to self-defense, free enterprise and property rights, they fail miserably on the matters of respecting an individual’s right to do with their physical body as they choose, whether that is in respect to the sexual activity of consenting adults, or one’s decision to self-medicate with substances categorized as illegal or controlled intoxicants, or to even use such intoxicants recreationally.  This Republican position is largely based upon adherence to religious standards that the very same Republicans frequently fall short of in their own personal lives.

Relegating the two parties to ‘ballast for dead weight’, both the Republicans and the Democrats have recently confirmed a mutual disdain towards – and a distrust for – Americans’ enjoying their Fourth Amendment right to privacy.  Thus, when held to the standards of the Founders’ original intentions, an extremely generous rating for the ideologies of either party on the matter of personal liberty yields a score of something less than 50-percent, and indicts them both for basing policies upon an irrational blend of emotional and egoistic triggers.  It has, however, so far proven to be an effective means by which to captivate the minds of a large number of Americans, and through which, has led the American people into decade after decade of self-injury.

Secondly, both the Democrats and the Republicans have their own uniquely irrational, and nonintellectual, perspectives on the matter of peace.  One could accurately simplify the matter by stating that, for the Democrats, there is no such thing as a good war – unless it is declared by a Democratic president (for then – and only then – is it a justifiable action) and for the Republicans, there is simply no such thing as a bad war.

But to offer some deeper insight as to the emotional and egotistical motivations of the Democratic and Republican mind-sets regarding war, one must first realize that, Democratic approval, or disapproval, of war, as the case may be, is always based primarily upon ideals, and has very little to do with national security.  Thus, for those of a Democratic persuasion, the peace may be sacrificed so that the social engineering that is integral to the Democratic platform may be enforced upon the people of foreign nations at the end of a gun – particularly if the policies being enforced are of a socialistic or liberal bent.  The Republicans have no such ideals when it comes to sacrificing the peace, and for this the world should be very thankful.  Though, the Republicans will always make use of some version of those same Democratic ideals when pleading a case to the American public for sacrificing the peace.  For those of the Republican persuasion, legitimizing the call for war is as simple as noticing anyone else in the world holding a gun whom has not already agreed to cede national sovereignty, relinquish all natural resources, and obey every command given to him or her by the government of the USA – or the government of Great Britain – or the government of Israel.  Equal to this aforementioned justification, is the justification for sacrificing the peace for commercial purposes, or in other words, protecting (or enforcing) the commercial interests held by individuals or corporations – even if these individuals or corporations are foreign – provided, of course, that a really good story is concocted to cover up the true motivation, and, under the veil of some false magnanimity, the right members of Congress can make a few bucks.  Religious differences are often exploited during this process.  Ironically, this willingness to violate international law in the use of military force stands in stark contrast to the Republicans’ claim that they stand as ‘the party of the rule of law’.

In the end, neither the Democrats nor the Republicans demonstrate a foreign policy that is in any way reflective of the intentions of the Founders, or one that could in any way be classified as the product of strength, character, or the ‘benevolence’ by which both parties claim guides their actions.  Both parties score a zero on the matter of ‘peace’ and are equally guilty of using emotional and egoistic triggers to manipulate the public, which, thus far, both parties have done with great success.

Thirdly, both the Republicans and the Democrats have their own uniquely corrupt, and nonintellectual, perspectives on the matter of prosperity.  Once again, those of the Democratic persuasion fail to give good regard to this right, and due in the largest part to their failures on the matters of the right to free enterprise, and in regards to the individual’s right to property.  As the Democratic mindset finds government partnership in all matters of business essential, free enterprise and property rights yield to tyranny.  No matter how kind or gentle the tyranny may appear to be, it is tyranny, nonetheless. Ergo, prosperity becomes, in effect, ‘regulated’ by the state, with the state taking an ever-increasing share from the top, and leaving a perpetually shrinking share from which a growing population must divide.  In yet another Republican irony, while those of this political persuasion insist that they are the party representing the entrepreneur and the self-reliant, as a result of their collective avarice, history convicts the Republicans as being the great enemy of capitalism and free-enterprise, this being done through their fanatically loyal support, and defense, of corporatism.  As a matter of fact, it would often appear as though that, should a large corporation – especially a foreign one – desire to crush the competition posed by an American small business owner, it is likely to be the jackboot of a Republican legislator stomping on said small businessperson’s face.

Clearly, both the Republicans and the Democrats fail miserably on the matter of prosperity, with those of the Democratic persuasion preferring for Americans a kinder, gentler form of state-regulated slavery, and those of the Republican persuasion, preferring the American people to live under the yoke of a less kind, and less gentle, form of slavery, this one being regulated by corporations.  Equally clear is the use of emotional and egoistic triggers (fear, greed and envy) by both team Red and team Blue, as well as this tactic’s so far having been another highly effective means by which to control the thoughts and actions of the majority of the American public.

In summary, it is clear that, the continued success of the Republican and Democratic parties, despite overwhelming evidence of their equal betrayal and failure, can be reduced to the parties’ preying upon the qualities of avarice, cowardice, laziness, gluttony, envy and desire to shed blood, common to those whom are drawn to the political platforms of either team Red or team Blue.  So what is that I am actually saying, one might ask? I’m saying that the vast majority of Americans, those who identify with their ‘being’ either a ‘Republican’ or a ‘Democrat’, are as stupid as they are weak, and as they are irrational. Additionally, I am saying that, both the Republican and Democratic parties discovered long ago that intellect is used by only a small portion the population when it comes to the matter of politics, and in that, found the means by which to pander to the most base, and primal instincts of the larger part of the American public, which for those of the Democratic persuasion, is primarily focused upon the genitals, and for those of the Republican persuasion, is almost entirely focused upon the wallet or purse.

During his stand up routine, comedian Lewis Black once said, “The Republicans and the Democrats are like a bowl of sh**, staring at itself in the mirror.” I don’t think Mr. Black’s metaphor was too harsh.  I would add to Lewis’ analogy that, those who, at this late stage of the game, are still supportive of either team Red or team Blue, are, and in the greater part, hopelessly nonintellectual, and of such significantly flawed character, that their potential to actually function as a truly beneficial influence in the American political process is nil, and, like the parties they support, serve as nothing other than ballast for dead weight.

Carpe Noctem,



Wednesday – In November of 2010, in the inaugural issue of Judicium Astrologica (in print) I referred to the Republicans and Democrats as the right and left buttock, respectively, of the same dirty ass that has been defecating on America for nearly 100 years, with each buttock blaming the other buttock for making the mess.  As the curtain lowered at the end of today’s Congressional performance, and, each having obtained what they truly wanted, the Republicans and Democrats took their bows, and once again, Congress’ audience, the American people, got screwed.   Is there still anyone, with the exception of the idiot or the liar, who can deny that the nation’s two predominant political parties are equally to blame for the destruction of America?  Is there still anyone, with the exception of the idiot or the liar, who can deny that both the Republican and Democratic parties are wholly corrupt and long beyond any repair?

This post is titled 2013 Fourth Quarter Blog Hiatus, and as its name suggests, it is an announcement that I will be taking the rest of the year off from writing for this blog, the time away allowing me to focus on another astrological project.  I will, however, still be providing all of my astrological services to my clients.

For the time being, I will leave my readers with two thoughts, the first of which pertains to America’s horoscope, my interpretation of which, leaves me to give the warning that, since 1993, the greater part of America’s leadership has been, is now, and will continue to be, influenced primarily by people the stars indicate as being the enemies of America.  The second thought is relative to the first, and it comes in the form of a question that I have begun frequently posing to readers:  Can free men and women be led?

Carpe Noctem.


For questions pertaining to astrological matters, readers may visit: .  Legal professionals and investigators should first visit: .

P.S. Should enough readers protest this hiatus, and convince me that the information I provide within this blog to be of sufficient importance to them, then I will abbreviate the hiatus.


On September 28, 2013, the Daily Mail’s Marie-Louise Olson reported on highly respected journalist Seymour Hersh’s assertion that the Obama Administration’s account of the raid during which Osama bin Laden was allegedly killed is a lie.

Once again, Judicium Astrologica has been considerably ahead of the pack on this issue.

From Judicium Astrologica, Issue 06, May, 2011:  Osama bin Laden: A Retrospective, I wrote, “Sunday, May 1, 2011 (appx. 7:48 pm AZT) – An interruption in normally scheduled network television programming brought news that Osama bin Laden had been killed.  About a quarter hour after the breaking of the news, President Barack Obama addressed the American people, giving an account of a directive he said he gave to then-CIA director Leon Panetta in early 2009 regarding the dispatch of Osama bin Laden as being his number one priority as President.  The Commander in Chief’s following words painted a picture wherein American intelligence agencies coordinated with our valorous military for an audacious mission in which the Western world’s most wanted man was brought to justice at the business end of an American rifle. Upon initial receipt of the news, I was nearly inclined to celebrate that the son-of-a-bitch Osama bin Laden was dead.  But having been immersed in my work for the predictive part of this very newsletter on that same evening, I was acutely aware of the evil stellar influences under which the USA was when the news broke (as well as for several days preceding, and after) and thus, was immediately skeptical.  And when it was said that Osama bin Laden’s body was buried at sea, I became thoroughly unconvinced as to the legitimacy of the Obama Administration’s assertion.  My initial thought on the matter was the oddity that, in an environment where a considerable portion of the American people are still doubtful of the naturalized birth of President Obama – and thus have so little trust in him – that in a matter of such great importance as this, Obama himself would not have insisted on a state-side autopsy of Osama bin Laden’s remains.  I also questioned that, at a time when the President’s approval rating had fallen so low, would not clever Democratic advisors and strategists have convinced the President to make some sort of display of the trophy, if even accidentally.  Which then led me to further contemplate President Obama’s dismal approval rating, and the now-unsettling timing of this event (as well as a series of other events leading up to this point).  These thoughts, in turn, led me to remind myself of my analysis of President Obama’s nativity in relation to that of the USA, and the double-whammy of his Mercury in opposition to the USA’s Pluto – and his Pluto in semi-square to the USA’s Mercury – suggesting that he would have a strong tendency to deceive America through his speech and writings.”

In summarizing my astrological judgement of this matter I wrote, “ Having now worked on this matter for weeks, I can find nothing in the USA’s chart to support the event of the apprehension or dispatch of a notorious fugitive – only that of a high-profile assassination.  My astrological assessment of the matter of the death of Osama bin Laden is that, whatever it was that actually happened on that day (and I do believe that someone was assassinated) it was interwoven with details that would either indict the US government in having taken part in some previous grand-deception upon the American public, or was, in itself, nothing more than fabricated tale of heroism – a fairy tale designed to bolster a failing President’s public approval rating.  Either way, if we are to believe that the executed was in fact Osama bin Laden, as there was no autopsy performed on the corpse, and as the remains were disposed of at sea, the truth – the whole truth – is likely to remain a monumental secret withheld from the American public.”

Readers may find the complete astrological judgment on the Judicium Astrologica blog at:

Other news sources that also question the legitimacy of the Obama Administration’s story regarding the dispatch of Osama bin Laden can be found at:


Tuesday – Having listened to President Barack Obama today, my interpretation of the core meaning of his words is that, he does not like, nor does he approve of, the US political process when it does not result in his getting his own way.  My guess is that, President Obama believes he would make an excellent dictator.

Completely unrelated to President Obama and his administration, I think that it is important to remember that, when a would-be-tyrant’s glorious pride has been wounded, or his or her sense of absolute, god-like authority challenged, that would-be-tyrant can resort to vindictive behavior.